JOIN
DONATE
Our stances and the latest developments we are monitoring.
It has been more than a year since the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Fix Our Forests Act (FOFA) on a strong bipartisan vote, and despite broad support in the Senate, there is no vote scheduled. The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation is working the Senate side of Capitol Hill to try to get through the logjam but getting floor time for a vote is proving elusive.
“Every time a legislative crisis shows up in the news, whether it is a government shutdown or budget bills or confirmation fights, that takes up precious time for the debate and vote that we need to get Fix Our Forests across the finish line. It is starting to feel like only fire season will enable us to cut through the noise,” said Ryan Bronson, RMEF director of government affairs.
FOFA features a set of reforms to improve wildlife habitat quality in national forests, in addition to reducing catastrophic fire risk. It simplifies and expedites environmental reviews for forest management projects, promote federal, state, tribal and local collaboration in forest management, strengthen tools like Good Neighbor Authority and stewardship contracting to maximize return on investment, deters frivolous litigation that delays essential projects, including to reverse the 9th Circuit Court’s Cottonwood decision, and encourage the adoption of state-of-the-art science and technologies for federal land managers.
Senate rules require 60 votes to end debate on most legislation and end so-called filibusters. RMEF and its allies continue to work to ensure that there are more than 60 votes when the time comes.
Bronson already made two trips to Washington, D.C., in 2026 with a focus on Senate offices that may be on the fence, emphasizing the link between active management and habitat with wildfire resilience. The efforts have been generally successful, with most concerns focused on funding levels and not the policy provisions in the bill.
RMEF’s biggest concern is that as the politics in Congress over other issues become more bitter, and the fall elections get closer, willingness to pass even bipartisan issues like FOFA will become more difficult.
“We just met with Senate staffers from Washington, New Mexico, Oregon, Arizona and Pennsylvania offices and found broad support for improved forest policy. We need to get the bill on the floor for a vote,” added Bronson.
About Hunt 2 Conserve
Hunt 2 Conserve is a 501(c)4 nonprofit organization affiliated with the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation. Its mission is to advance a legacy of hunting and conservation by educating, activating and developing stewards and defenders of these fundamentally American ideals. For more information, go to hunt2conserve.org.
(Photo credit: Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation)
A congressional subcommittee recently heard testimony about first-hand work by the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation to open and improve public access. It happened in relation to a January 13, 2026, oversight hearing by the House Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fisheries titled, “Hunting and Fishing Access in the Great American Outdoors.”
One of those asked to testify before the committee was Paul Johansen, wildlife biologist and chief of the Wildlife Resources Section of the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources. Johansen also serves as president of the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, an organization comprised of state fish and wildlife agencies from across North America. In addition to oral testimony before the committee, Johansen also submitted detailed written testimony highlighting the importance of access, including praise for a multi-year RMEF land conservation and access project in the Pacific Northwest.
“In Oregon, the state recently acquired more than 16,000-plus acres to complete the Minam River Wildlife Area in Union and Wallowa Counties. The wildlife area creates public access to the Eagle Cap Wilderness Area and the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, making the entire Minam River publicly accessible for hunting, fishing and other recreational opportunities.
“The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, USFS (U.S. Forest Service) Forest Legacy Program, USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) Wildlife Restoration Program and many of Oregon’s hunting and outdoor recreation groups all raised money to purchase land for the wildlife area. With this acquisition, an area larger than Yellowstone National Park, is all in public ownership and open for recreation (ODFW [Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife], Oregon Parks and Rec Dept, BLM [Bureau of Land Management] and USFS ownership). Anglers can enjoy trout and mountain whitefish fishing, hunters can target deer and elk, and hikers can follow the Minam River Trail to the Eagle Cap Wilderness.”
Johansen also touted work in his home state to successfully restore wild elk to their native West Virginia range. RMEF also supplied significant funding and volunteer support for those efforts.
“This management effort had two primary objectives. First, through the capture and translocation of elk from Kentucky and Arizona, we successfully returned this majestic animal to the mountains of southern West Virginia. Second, we wanted to ensure that these elk were reestablished into suitable habitats that were publicly accessible for wildlife-associated recreation. Working closely with coal mining and timber companies, we were able to secure more than 54,000 acres of publicly accessible land as an essential component of our elk restoration effort,” wrote Johansen.
Since its establishment in 1984, RMEF worked alongside partner organizations to open or improve public access for hunters, anglers and others to more than 1.6 million acres of land.
As a strong advocate of hunting, Hunt 2 Conserve supports this initiative.
The Department of the Interior (DOI) announced a series of priorities that target conservation, hunting and other recreation, natural resource stewardship and growth. The Make America Beautiful Commission, which includes several Trump administration cabinet members and is chaired by DOI Secretary Doug Burgum, released what it calls MABA 250, a strategic initiative to serve as a framework for future conservation policies.
“By honoring our past while building for our future, through responsible conservation, the MABA 250 initiative’s groundbreaking framework will ensure our nation's treasured lands and historic legacy are responsibly managed and preserved for centuries to come," said Secretary Burgum.
Key priorities include balancing stewardship and economic growth, increasing access for hunting, fishing and other recreation, expanding voluntary conservation, reducing red tape by extremists and bureaucracy, and recovering species and supporting habitat.
Below is the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation's stance about the commission’s work:
RMEF commends the Make America Beautiful Commission appointed by President Trump for its strategic initiative, MABA 250. The priorities laid out in MABA 250 align with our mission to ensure the future of elk, other wildlife, their habitat and our hunting heritage. We look forward to increasing the pace of our shared work priorities, including expanding public access for hunting and fishing, enhancing wildlife habitat on public lands, supporting private conservation and stewardship, and reducing red tape that slows this work down.
We are particularly heartened by the MABA 250 Commission’s recognition of the conservation achievement of the Great American Outdoor Act (GAOA), which provided permanent funding for the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF). RMEF has worked with federal and state agencies in cooperation with private landowners to increase and improve public access and quality wildlife habitat with LWCF investments.
The Trump administration’s decision to redirect nearly $8 million to grants supporting big-game migration corridors builds on the great success of Secretarial Order 3362. RMEF encourages Congress to codify those executive actions by passing the Wildlife Movement Through Partnerships Act.
Also aligned with these priorities is RMEF’s top federal legislative agenda item, the Fix Our Forests Act. This comprehensive bipartisan forest management package reduces red tape and litigation that currently hinders habitat improvement in our national forests and is critical to improving public forest landscapes. To address voluntary conservation of our forests, we seek to include a Forest Conservation Easement Program in a Farm Bill.
RMEF President/CEO Kyle Weaver (left) and RMEF Chief Conservation Officer Blake Henning (right) during a visit with Secretary Doug Burgum (middle) in his Washington, D.C., office
Click here to view the DOI news release.
January 23, 2026, marked one year since the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Fix Our Forests Act. To mark the occasion, Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-AR), chairman of the House Committee on Natural Resources, released the statement below.
“A year — and another devastating wildfire season — has come and gone since the House came together and passed the Fix Our Forests Act with an overwhelming bipartisan majority. Catastrophic wildfires aren’t like hurricanes or tornadoes; we can and should take proactive steps to prevent devastating wildfires from becoming our new normal. We can’t afford to wait any longer, and it’s time for the Senate to pass this important legislation and send it to the President’s desk before the next preventable disaster strikes.”
Fires burned almost five million acres in 2025. That came on the heels of a 2024 wildfire season that charred more than 8.9 million acres of forestland and destroyed 4,500 structures. The taxpayer bill to fight the fires is in the billions of dollars.
The Fix Our Forests Act is a set of reforms to improve the quality of wildlife habitat in national forests that would also reduce the risk of high-intensity fires and improve overall forest health.
The House passed the measure on a strong bipartisan 279-141 vote. The Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry passed the legislation on an 18-5 vote in October 2025, although it is yet to be taken up by the full Senate.
Hunt 2 Conserve strongly supports the Fix Our Forests Act and urges the Senate to approve it as soon as possible.
Below is a news release from the U.S. House Committee on Agriculture.
House Committee on Agriculture Chairman Glenn “GT” Thompson (PA-15) announced Rep. Dan Newhouse (WA-04) as the new chairman of the Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticulture.
“Rep. Newhouse is a valued and engaged member of our committee, and I am proud to see him stepping up to lead the Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticulture," Chairman Thompson said. "He has proven himself to be a true advocate for our country’s working lands and specialty crop producers, and I know this subcommittee will thrive under his leadership. Mr. LaMalfa left big shoes to fill, but I have no doubt in my mind that Rep. Newhouse is the right person to carry on his legacy.”
“It’s truly a privilege to receive the gavel for the Forestry and Horticulture Subcommittee,” Rep. Newhouse said. "These are two issues that are at the center of our agriculture industry and natural resources in the State of Washington, and I look forward to working closely with Chairman Thompson on moving the Farm Bill this Congress. It is also an honor to fill the shoes of my late friend, Doug LaMalfa, who led this subcommittee as a fighter for these issues in Northern California. I am thankful for this opportunity and ready to get to work.”
The late Rep. Doug LaMalfa (CA-01), who passed away in January, was the previous chairman of the Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticulture.
(Photo credit: Rep. Dan Newhouse)
In a letter (see below) to U.S. House leadership, the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation joined 19 other hunting, fishing and sportsmen and women organizations by urging lawmakers to pass H.R. 281, the Grizzly Bear State Management Act. The legislation would reinstate the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service decision to remove grizzlies as a threatened species in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.
RMEF has long advocated for state management of recovered grizzly bear populations in line with its support of the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation, under which state management of wildlife, along with the financial contributions from hunters, dramatically increased wildlife populations across the United States over the last century.
RMEF maintains that state wildlife agencies should sustainably manage grizzlies just as they manage elk, deer, moose, black bears, mountain lions, pronghorn antelope and other wildlife for their overall betterment.
-----
Honorable Mike Johnson
Office of the Speaker
U.S. House of Representatives
U.S. Capitol
Washington, DC 20515
Honorable Steve Scalise
Office of Majority Leader
January 21, 2026
Dear Speaker Johnson and Majority Leader Scalise:
The undersigned organizations, representing millions of hunters, anglers, wildlife professionals, and outdoor enthusiasts, write to express our strong support for H.R. 281, the Grizzly Bear State Management Act. This bill will reinstate the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s science-based decision to remove grizzly bears in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem from the Endangered Species Act lists. The bill prioritizes science and returns these long-recovered bears to state management—where they belong. We respectfully request that H.R. 281 be considered by the entire House as soon as possible.
The Service delisted these grizzly bears in 2007 and again in 2017, using the best available science and in collaboration with the States of Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. Unfortunately, these rules were reversed through litigation. H.R. 281 would end that vicious cycle and allow the Service to focus its limited resources on truly at-risk species.
There is no question that grizzly bears in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem have biologically recovered. This population has almost doubled its recovery metrics and no longer meets the definition of a threatened species. Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming should be celebrated and rewarded for their success. They have demonstrated their ability to properly manage grizzly bears. And they require flexibility to deal with the challenges that come with this extensive population recovery and expansion, particularly the significant increase in human-bear conflicts.
The Grizzly Bear State Management Act recognizes this reality. It elevates the Service’s science-based reasoning over that of activist organizations and courts and aligns with past Congressional delisting actions, such as the 2011 delisting of gray wolves in the same States.
For these reasons, we strongly support H.R. 281, the Grizzly Bear State Management Act. We respectfully request that H.R. 281 be scheduled for a vote in the House as quickly as possible, and before the end of this Congress.
Thank you for your leadership and commitment to science-based wildlife management
Sincerely,
Archery Trade Association
Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies
Boone and Crockett Club
Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation
Conservation Force
Dallas Safari Club
Houston Safari Club
Mule Deer Foundation
National Deer Association
National Rifle Association
National Shooting Sports Foundation
National Wild Turkey Federation
Pope and Young Club
Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation
Safari Club International
Safari Club International Foundation
Sportsmen’s Alliance
Whitetails Unlimited
Wild Sheep Foundation
Wildlife Forever
(Photo credit: Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks)
Hunt 2 Conserve aligns with the conservation views of those organizations below.
The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation is among nearly three dozen conservation, hunting and outdoor organizations calling on Congress to support a key farmland conservation program and its undeniable role supplying critical habitat for wildlife.
In a December 2025 letter (see below) to congressional leadership, the groups want the next farm bill to include foundational support for the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), which encourages agricultural producers and landowners to convert highly erodible and other environmentally sensitive acreage to vegetative cover, like native grasses, trees and riparian buffers. Doing so benefits a wide array of wildlife species.
“This program was originally established more than four decades ago in the 1985 Farm Bill and is probably the most impactful private land conservation effort ever implemented,” said Blake Henning, RMEF chief conservation officer.
For each of the last three years, CRP existed under one-year extensions but according to the groups, a long-term reauthorization gives producers a more reliable and effective way to manage their land.
December 22, 2025
The Honorable John Boozman
Chairman
Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry
United States Senate Washington, DC 20510
The Honorable Amy Klobuchar
Ranking Member
The Honorable Glenn “GT” Thompson
House Committee on Agriculture
United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515
The Honorable Angie Craig
Dear Chairman Boozman, Ranking Member Klobuchar, Chairman Thompson, and Ranking Member Craig:
The undersigned organizations, representing millions of hunters, anglers, wildlife professionals, and outdoor enthusiasts, urge you to ensure the next farm bill includes strong support for the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). As CRP celebrates its 40th anniversary on December 23, 2025, Congress has an opportunity to mark four decades of voluntary stewardship on private lands by strengthening one of the most successful conservation programs in American history.
Since 1985, CRP has been a cornerstone of the farm safety net, giving producers a voluntary, market-based tool to manage risk on their most marginal and environmentally sensitive acres. For countless farmers and ranchers, enrolling vulnerable acres in CRP helps stabilize operations, diversify on-farm income, and protect long-term productivity, especially during periods of volatile commodity prices and input costs, severe drought, or extreme weather.
At the same time, CRP has delivered unparalleled conservation outcomes over the last 40 years. The program has dramatically reduced soil erosion, improved water quality, enhanced soil health, and provided some of the nation’s most important habitats for myriad wildlife species. Land enrolled in CRP bolsters rural economies by supporting outdoor recreation and access, while targeted initiatives like the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP) and State Acres for Wildlife Enhancement (SAFE) demonstrate how the program is tailored to meet local resource needs. Grassland CRP and emergency forage authorities have helped the program evolve into a flexible tool for producers to improve and utilize working lands on their operations.
For the past several years, however, CRP has operated under three successive one-year extensions, creating uncertainty for producers who depend on stable enrollment options and consistent program rules. While leaders at USDA have done an excellent job administering the program under less-than-ideal circumstances, a full, long-term reauthorization is critical to ensure that CRP continues to provide the reliability and predictability producers need to manage risk and steward their land.
As Congress continues developing the next farm bill, this anniversary offers a timely reminder of how well CRP works—and how we can build on the program’s impressive record by making it more accessible and effective for landowners, while strengthening outcomes for wildlife, soil, and water. Reauthorizing and improving CRP now will ensure the program continues meeting the needs of growers, rural communities, and natural resources for decades to come.
We appreciate your ongoing leadership and your long-standing commitment to rural America, agricultural producers, hunters and anglers, and voluntary conservation. We look forward to working with you to ensure CRP’s next 40 years deliver even greater benefits for farmers, ranchers, rural communities, and wildlife.
American Woodcock Society
Backcountry Hunters & Anglers
California Waterfowl Association
Delta Waterfowl
Ducks Unlimited
Izaak Walton League of America
National Association of Forest Service Retirees
National Bobwhite & Grassland Initiative Foundation
National Wildlife Federation
North American Falconers Association
North American Grouse Partnership
Pheasants Forever
Quail Forever
Ruffed Grouse Society
Texas Wildlife Association
The Wildlife Society
Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership
Wildlife Management Institute
Wildlife Mississippi
Marking a win for wildlife and conservation, the U.S. House Natural Resources Committee approved a package of reforms to the Endangered Species Act, clearing the way for a potential vote by the entire U.S. House of Representatives.
The ESA Amendments Act of 2025 (H.R. 1897) makes reforms to the Endangered Species Act by streamlining the listing process, clarifying statutory definitions and focusing on recovery. It also provides incentives for the recovery of listed species, promotes accountability for agency actions, expands cooperation with local governments and creates a backstop against frivolous litigation by placing a cap on attorney’s fees.
“Five decades after the ESA’s passage, only three percent of listed species have ever recovered. Special-interest lawsuits and arbitrary rules have weaponized the law against both wildlife and the communities it’s supposed to help,” said Chairman Bruce Westerman (R-AR). “H.R. 1897 restores science, conservation and sustainable economic development to America’s endangered species policy and returns the ESA to its original, bipartisan purpose as a tool for species recovery.”
Hunt 2 Conserve and the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation support this legislation.
“Five decades of case law informed by radical environmental activists has transformed the Endangered Species Act into a purgatory for wildlife. As sportsmen and women, RMEF takes seriously our commitment to wildlife conservation and believes we can and should do better,” said RMEF President and CEO Kyle Weaver. “This measure represents a positive step towards returning the ESA to its original mission, ensuring already limited resources go towards species recovery, not fighting endless court battles. RMEF thanks Chairman Westerman for his leadership on this bill.”
RMEF testified before the committee in 2024 on similar legislation, focusing on incremental recovery targets for threatened species and increased state authority in meeting those targets. These reforms are consistent with RMEF’s efforts to repeal the “blanket rule,” which implements one-size-fits-all restrictions for threatened species and requires the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to establish individual plans to move threatened species to recovered status.
Hunt 2 Conserve agrees with rescinding the blanket rule for the benefit of wildlife.
The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation and Property and Environment Research Center (PERC) applauded a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) decision to repeal the blanket 4(d) rule in a recent joint public comment.
The two organizations filed a lawsuit in late 2024 challenging the agency’s previous adoption of the rule. RMEF’s primary criticism is that the blanket rule uses a one-size-fits-all approach by treating endangered and threatened species the same. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) allows for less restrictions and more flexibility for threatened species, which provides incentives to states and private landowners to make progress towards recovery. USFWS reversed course and agreed in the summer of 2025 and will rescind the rule by the end of 2026.
RMEF and PERC submitted their comments (see below) and made several main points during a 30-day comment period after USFWS published its decision in late 2025:
Re: Proposed Rescission of the “Blanket Rule” that Regulates Threatened Species as if They were Endangered
Dear Director Nesvik,
The Property and Environment Research Center (PERC) and Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation (RMEF) applaud the Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) proposal to rescind the “blanket rule” that arbitrarily regulates endangered and threatened species the same and ignores the Endangered Species Act’s (ESA) text, science, species’ unique needs, and recovery progress. For those reasons, PERC and RMEF filed a lawsuit challenging the previous administration’s adoption of the blanket rule.
In July, President Trump directed the Service, and other federal agencies, to “recover America’s fish and wildlife populations through proactive, voluntary, on-the-ground conservation efforts.” Rescinding the blanket rule is a vital and necessary step toward fulfilling that policy. The blanket rule arbitrarily prohibits proactive, voluntary conservation, including habitat restoration. And, in doing so, it discourages species' recovery. Tailored rules, however, remove roadblocks for proactive conservation efforts, including prescribed fire, forest thinning, and stream restoration.
The blanket rule also ignores science and the important role of state wildlife agencies. Under it, the Service never assesses how to best promote the recovery of most species, despite the ESA requiring this analysis for every threatened species. Instead, it imposes an illegal and arbitrary one-size-fits-all approach that Congress rejected when it limited Section 9 to endangered species. Instead, Congress intended states to take a greater role in recovering and managing threatened species. Yet the blanket rule, without explanation, deprives states of the flexibility needed to fill that role.
Finally, as the Service explained in 2019, and reaffirmed in 2024, developing tailored rules for each threatened species “incentivize[s] conservation for both endangered and threatened species.” The blanket rule, by treating endangered and threatened species the same, removes this incentive by denying states and landowners any reward for recovery progress.
We elaborate on these points in the detailed comments submitted with this letter. Thank you for your continued leadership and focus on species recovery.
Property and Environment Research Center
(Photo credit: Jim Peaco/NPS)
By a vote of 211-204, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill that would delist gray wolves in the Lower 48. The Pet and Livestock Protection Act, supported by Hunt 2 Conserve and the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, would restore management authority to state wildlife agencies.
“We salute House membership for agreeing with scientists and wildlife management professionals that wolf populations are stable and growing and should return to state management,” said Blake Henning, RMEF chief conservation officer. “The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service delisted wolves in the Lower 48 states twice in the last decade and a half – during the Obama administration in 2011 and the Trump administration in 2020. Both times, judges intervened to invalidate the process.”
Rep. Tom Tiffany (R-WI) and Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) sponsored the legislation. It will not change any statutes but instead implements a rule issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in 2020.
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) introduced a companion bill in the Senate, which requires 60 votes to overcome a filibuster.
“State wildlife agencies sustainably manage thousands of species without federal interference, and several states in the Northern Rockies are successfully managing wolves because Congress took action to protect their delisting from activist judges,” said Henning. “We thank Representatives Tiffany and Boebert for sponsoring this legislation. RMEF calls on the Senate to follow suit and pass the bill.”
5705 Grant Creek, Suite CMissoula, MT 59808
info@hunt2conserve.org
© 2026 Hunt 2 Conserve
Hunt 2 Conserve is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization affiliated with the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, a registered 501(c)(3) organization.